This is the 2007 version. Click here for the 2017 chapter 13 table of contents.

Criticisms of Rogers

There are many criticisms of Rogers. He is the father of the language sometimes called psychobabble. DeMott (1979) identifies the following phrases, traceable to Rogers, which have become common: "going with the flow," "getting in touch with my feelings," "working at my relationship," "being open to experience." Some people find such language unbearably trite, but it was not trite when Rogers wrote about it. In 1946 nobody but Rogers was saying "go with the flow," and Rogers was quite radical and different in urging people to relax their facades and find their true selves.

What type of phrases in popular language is traceable to Rogers? What was a Rogerian college class like?

A more serious criticism is that Rogers carried nondirection to an extreme. He wrote once that "nobody can teach anybody anything." Rogers thought the relationship that worked in therapy was a model for all social relationships between humans. For example, in the college classroom, a Rogerian teacher let students invent the content of the course. Discussions in such a class were punctuated by long, awkward silences. Rogers said that was to be expected. Ultimately students would evolve a valuable course. To others, such a course was a waste of time and a reductio ad absurdum (reduction to absurdity) of Rogerian theory, showing you can push a good thing too far.

What types of clients proved ill-suited for Rogerian therapy?

A third criticism of Rogers is that he claimed Rogerian methods can be applied to each and every problem. However, there is no evidence that biological problems like schizophrenia or autism respond well to the Rogerian approach. Rogers also noted that certain clients, such as those who entered therapy expecting practical advice, were likely to become disillusioned by nondirective therapy and drop out quickly.

What is the "echoing" technique and how did Weizenbaum satirize it?

Finally, Rogerian therapy is sometimes reduced to the sterile technique of "echoing" what a client says. Rogers recommended that a Rogerian therapist repeat or paraphrase a client's thoughts, in order to insure comprehension was taking place. That is actually a valuable technique, but it can be silly if it is done too often or too automatically. It lends itself to parody, as in the computer program ELIZA developed by Joseph Weizenbaum of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Eliza was written to satirize Rogerian counseling by echoing statements back to the user. If you typed in, "I am worried about my grades": ELIZA would reply with something along the lines of, "What worries you about your grades?" The program does not understand what you are typing in; it just takes what you say and echoes part of it back to you as a question. A therapist who really did this (and no therapist should) would come across as more like an uncaring machine than an empathetic listener.

Write to Dr. Dewey at

Don't see what you need? Psych Web has over 1,000 pages, so it may be elsewhere on the site. Do a site-specific Google search using the box below.

Custom Search

Copyright © 2007-2011 Russ Dewey